<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Pravzaprav je dosti večje odstopanje zaradi relativno redkega
      vzorčenja SRTM v primerjavi z LIDAR podatki. 90m proti 1 m. Večina
      (vsi) interpolacijskih algoritmov ima v dolinah (+) in na grebenih
      (-) zelo velika odstopanja. Če pogledaš kako cesto za katero veš
      da se enakomerno vzpenja boš na SRTM plastnicah dobil vtis kot da
      se v vsaki dolini precej dvigne na grebenu pa spusti, tudi po
      100m. Če pogledaš plastnice generirane iz LIDAR podatkov lahko
      vidiš da je vzpon enakomeren.</p>
    <p>Pozdrav,<br>
        Blaž<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30. 05. 2017 10:27, Stefan Baebler
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAC8Zp0hyF6DOx80M2xX_X_21jxgBG_U2VhQ7wMLc9wmam8ELDw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Ja, ta teza bo kar držala, ker se vidi, da so
        odstopanja (radar izmeril višjo višino kot lidar) večja tam kjer
        je gozd, tam kjer ga ni (travniki) so pa sta višini reliefov
        precej bolj podobni.
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>lp,</div>
        <div>Štefan</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2017-05-29 22:05 GMT+02:00 Igor Brejc <span
            dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:igor.brejc@gmail.com" target="_blank">igor.brejc@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">SRTM višine so radarske, posnete iz Space
              Shuttla leta 2000. Do napak (npr. pri Sedovcu) verjetno
              prihaja zato, ker je ta radar meril odboj od dreves in ne
              od tal:
              <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><br>
                <b>Did the radar sample the tops of trees or the ground
                  level?<br>
                </b>The radar does not "see" through thick vegetation
                canopies. It probably penetrated a little way into some
                canopies, but in general it followed near the top of the
                canopy.</blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/faq.html"
                  target="_blank">https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/<wbr>srtm/faq.html</a> </div>
            </div>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">2017-05-29 21:11 GMT+02:00
                    Jaka Kranjc <span dir="ltr"><<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:smgl@lynxlynx.info" target="_blank">smgl@lynxlynx.info</a>></span>:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      <div class="m_-183428865876891720HOEnZb">
                        <div class="m_-183428865876891720h5">On Sun, 28
                          May 2017 20:33:06 +0200<br>
                          Marko Burjek <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:email4marko@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank">email4marko@gmail.com</a>>
                          wrote:<br>
                          <br>
                          > Pozdravljeni,<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Dne 27. maj 2017 21:15 je Jaka Kranjc
                          <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:smgl@lynxlynx.info"
                            target="_blank">smgl@lynxlynx.info</a>>
                          napisal/-a:<br>
                          ><br>
                          > > On Sat, 27 May 2017 17:46:12 +0200<br>
                          > > Mitja Jež <<a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:mitja@xn--je-3va.si"
                            target="_blank">mitja@xn--je-3va.si</a>>
                          wrote:<br>
                          > ><br>
                          > > > Pozdravljeni,<br>
                          > > ><br>
                          > > > On 03. 04. 2017 21:27, colored
                          stone wrote:<br>
                          > > > > Eno glavnih tem je "odprl"
                          Klemen, ki je nekaj povedal o<br>
                          > > > > orientacijskih kartah, ki
                          se uporabljajo pri orientacijskih<br>
                          > > > > tekmah v okviru
                          Orientacijske zveze Slovenije. Njegova ideja<br>
                          > > > > je, da bi poizkusili OSM
                          uporabiti kot podlago za izdelavo teh<br>
                          > > > > kart. Nekaj podobnega je
                          OPENORIENTEERINGMAP<br>
                          > > > > (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://oomap.co.uk/global/#/new/streeto_global/15/14.4876/46.0602/"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oomap.co.uk/global/#/n<wbr>ew/streeto_global/15/14.4876/4<wbr>6.0602/</a><br>
                          > > > > <<a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://oomap.co.uk/global/#/new/streeto_global/15/14.4876/46.0602/"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oomap.co.uk/global/#/n<wbr>ew/streeto_global/15/14.4876/4<wbr>6.0602/</a>>).<br>
                          > > ><br>
                          > > > za planinska orientacijska
                          tekmovanja rajše uporabljamo TOPO<br>
                          > > > karte. Najverjetneje jih bom v
                          te namene tiskal iz: OpenTopoMap<br>
                          > > > (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="https://opentopomap.org/#map=/15/46.0602/14.4876/"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://opentopomap.org/#map=<wbr>/15/46.0602/14.4876/</a>)<br>
                          > > A niso malo prerevne napram DTK,
                          sploh kar se tiče simbologije?<br>
                          > > Recimo jama vs jama z izvirom; pa
                          vrtače nimajo minusa.<br>
                          > ><br>
                          > To se da popravit, ker je stil na
                          GitHubu. Sam sem naredo karto z<br>
                          > OpenTopomap stilom in z slo LIDAR
                          višinami in je kr opazna razlika.<br>
                          > Marsikje se bolj natančno vidi potek
                          reliefa. Bom poskuso dat del na<br>
                          > net za primerjavo. Trenutno mam višine
                          samo za okolico Maribora na<br>
                          > računalniku, ker jih je dosti.<br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      Kjer so podatki že noter. POT-i pogosto potekajo v
                      pregovornih rovtah,<br>
                      ki so seveda slabše skartirane. Ponekod tudi ni
                      bila uvožena raba tal.<br>
                      V glavnem, precej dela.<br>
                      <br>
                      PS, glede na tvojo primerjalno karto tudi sumim
                      (pogosto odstopa za<br>
                      dve plastnici), da so na SRTM plastnicah GPS
                      višine, ne naše, kar še<br>
                      poslabša stvari. Napaka ni vedno vidna, je pa pri
                      Sedovcu (med Ruško<br>
                      in MB kočo), kjer je vrh nižji od višinskega pasu,
                      kateremu pripada.<br>
                      <div class="m_-183428865876891720HOEnZb">
                        <div class="m_-183428865876891720h5"><br>
                          LP<br>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                          ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                          Talk-si mailing list<br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:Talk-si@openstreetmap.org"
                            target="_blank">Talk-si@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.or<wbr>g/listinfo/talk-si</a><br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
            Talk-si mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Talk-si@openstreetmap.org">Talk-si@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk-si</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-si mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-si@openstreetmap.org">Talk-si@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>