<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Like you say, the coastline itself is easy but all the adjacent
landuse, natural, boundaries, wetlands, beaches etc can be a
gigantic mess. And usually you don't see the result of you work
until a few weeks later when the coastlines have been
re-processed.</p>
<p>I'm definitely deleting features too. Mostly from various MassGIS
imports. For example, in some places it seems that even minor
rocky seawalls were imported as "cliff".<br>
</p>
<p>- Lars<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/10/2016 06:00 PM, Alan Bragg
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJNWF5Dwq4aUPvw=NHEOZrbWsDtg0JROir+NDVFAtXABn7eX7Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet
ms",sans-serif;font-size:large">Lars,</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet
ms",sans-serif;font-size:large">I'm glad you are
continuing your coastline project. I did a few sections a
while ago and it can be torturous. It sure makes the map look
a lot better. I found I spent a lot of time dealing with the
landcover along the coast like tidal flats, marshes, dunes,
cliffs etc. I'm afraid many of them were so obsolete I just
had to delete them.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet
ms",sans-serif;font-size:large">Alan</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>