<div dir="ltr">Hi Greg,<div><br></div><div><a href="https://docs.digital.mass.gov/dataset/massgis-data-master-address-data-statewide-address-points-geocoding">https://docs.digital.mass.gov/dataset/massgis-data-master-address-data-statewide-address-points-geocoding</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>It looks like MassGIS clarified the licensing situation. It is cc-by. </div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by/">https://opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>OSM policy on cc-by v4 is that we should ask explicit permission to import it. </div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/">https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jason</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Greg Troxel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gdt@lexort.com" target="_blank">gdt@lexort.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Can you give us a brief summary, like who is proposing this, if they are<br>
local, and if they are knoww on the list?  I thought that the talk-us@<br>
email group was mandatory for US imports.<br>
<br>
Also, massgis's licensing seems to be perhaps changing, to something<br>
ccish instead of PD, but I suspect they don't really mean to exclude OSM<br>
use.  Perhaps that's changed again and I'm out of date.<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Talk-us-massachusetts mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us-massachusetts@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us-massachusetts@<wbr>openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us-massachusetts" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk-us-<wbr>massachusetts</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>