<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet ms",sans-serif;font-size:large">Greg, If you select all the nodes stacked at 117 Great Road (the shopping center) you'll find these "unit" numbers and their massgis status. I'm comfortable with the status "Active" but don't understand  "Linked" . The Unit 11A at 117 Great Road is the one "not found"</div><div class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">7<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">3<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">16<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1"><span style="white-space:pre">                                           </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">11<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">13<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">5<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">6<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">D<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">18<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">8<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">4<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">17<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">2<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">11A<span style="white-space:pre">                                                </span>NOT_FOUND</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">14<span style="white-space:pre">                                              </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">10<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">15<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">208<span style="white-space:pre">                                                </span>ACTIVE</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">12<span style="white-space:pre">                                         </span>LINKED</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="Calibri" size="1">9<span style="white-space:pre">                                          </span>LINKED</font></div></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="display:inline">Until we know more about these status codes, I wouldn't want to add anything to OSM other than those marked "Active" that have a centroid matching a building.</div></font></div><div><br></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet ms",sans-serif;font-size:large;display:inline"></div>Alan</font></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:29 PM Greg Troxel <<a href="mailto:gdt@lexort.com">gdt@lexort.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
None of those were in the set of points provided by Yury as really<br>
really not matching osm.<br>
<br>
Reading that list, the street names are all familiar.  Most of the<br>
addresses are not familiar (but they are likely just houses or<br>
somethihng that used to me, so they wouldn't be).<br>
<br>
But, 117 Great Road is a real address, of the shopping center in Lower<br>
Village.  It shows up that way in the L3 Parcels layer Jason made.<br>
<br>
Picking on 90-92 Packard for no apparent reason, there is a lot labeled<br>
90-92 on L3, and there are (DG sez) two structures there, of which one<br>
is clearly a house and the other probably a garage.  So maybe they mean<br>
that from the L3 db, the value 90-92 is suspect and they came up with 92<br>
for the address point.  Really hard to say.<br>
<br>
Picking on 341 Sudbury, again semi-randomly, there is a 339 and a 343 on<br>
L3, but no 341 lot (as of then).<br>
<br>
So I think they had some things that maybe existed, and they decided<br>
they didn't, and so far they don't look really confused.<br>
</blockquote></div>