<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">True. It would require a larger sign otherwise :-)<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Is that MassDOT’s idea, or are the Feds involved since this is I-90?<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">— Andy<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 14, 2019, at 12:21 PM, Wayne Emerson, Jr. via Talk-us-massachusetts <<a href="mailto:talk-us-massachusetts@openstreetmap.org" class="">talk-us-massachusetts@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">In my experience it is highway signage
which abbreviates. If the town is officially opposed to the short
name then it should have the long name on all the municipal
buildings in the linked changesets.</div>
</div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><img apple-inline="yes" id="D9DDE247-3751-4B11-89F7-BF4B829CE5EA" width="886" height="594" src="cid:2C9B5C8E-9C17-4DA4-B90F-E0601A02DC54@amherst.edu" class=""></div></div></body></html>