[Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.
Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.Net
Tue Apr 17 01:41:06 BST 2012
At 2012-04-16 13:52, stevea wrote:
>>At 2012-04-12 17:36, you wrote:
>>>I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days of
>>>re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac...
>>Can you comment on your process? I see very little real, coordinated info
>>about tools, concrete solutions, or teamwork. As a formerly quite active
>>SoCal mapper, I'm basically just dead in the water, wondering how much of
>>my hard work has just been discarded (e.g. speed-limits, lanes, turn
>>restrictions, source references, carefully aligned geometries, etc.) and
>>whether to bother trying to get it back. I can't possibly be alone (?).
>I almost forgot: in step 7 of my previous message, the Delete step may
>inform you that you are deleting from a relation. This is especially true
>of motorways, which are often described with relations. If this is the
>case, go ahead and confirm the deletion from the relation, making note of
>WHICH relation(s) this element is a member of.
Glad you mentioned that - it's something I've spent a lot of time on. Be
sure to note the role of the object in the relation as well. In the case of
turn restrictions, traffic-control, and housing relations, the role is as
important as the object's presence, and will break the relation without it.
So, we're left with:
>>I can't even find any info on the redaction. What is the plan? Where is
>>it now? How can I see what it's doing? Shouldn't there be a big, bold
>>link to this kind of info on the wiki main page?
Can someone involved comment?
Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.net>
More information about the Talk-us