<div dir="ltr">On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:25 AM, John Callahan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john.callahan@udel.edu">john.callahan@udel.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I am also very interested in getting the NHD data into OSM. We have a
few people here with plenty of experience working with USGS data,
especially NHD, and I'll try to get their reactions. I am new to
tagging and OSM in general but would like to get involved, particularly
with roads and hydro. A few quick questions:<br>
<br>
<br>
1) I would like to load our states (Delaware) NHD data using one of
Ian's converters. Ian, does it make sense for us to start now and let
you know which HUCs we've loaded, or should we wait until your data
gets in?</div></blockquote><div><br>I would prefer to wait until we figure out the tagging scheme before we start a mass import. On the main OSM discussion list they are also talking about a "code of conduct" for mass import/changes to the database, so we might want to wait a little to see what comes out of that.<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
<br>
2) Can features have more tags that what is on the Wiki,
<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:waterway" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:waterway</a>? For example, can
we leave the FCODE or FTYPE attributes in there? or add a reach
code? or use landuse=water even though it's not in the official
key-value list?</div></blockquote><div><br>Yes, in my tests I've been running, I keep all of the shapefile geometry attributes in the OSM export (including length_km, fcode, reachcode, etc.). Essentially, all we need to do is look at the FCODE and apply OSM-specific tags so that it makes sense in OSM-world. <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
<br>
3) How would we tag the HUC boundaries, which are essentially
watersheds? There are multiple levels of HUC groupings (4, 6, 8, 10,
12-digit HUCs), depending on what scale you're at. These would be
areas, possibly using the natural or landuse or boundary keys? </div></blockquote><div><br>I'm not entirely sure that we should import the HUC boundaries. They are easily accessible as shapefiles and don't really mean anything to the OSM folks. This is definitely up for debate and I'm by no means going to spend much time complaining if someone did import the boundaries. <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
<br>
4) I've used the online editor (Potlatch?) for simple editing and
creating new features. I got JOSM up and running, which I believe I
need to use for editing large number of features. What is the
procedure if I need to replace features, for example, if there exists
in OSM a river, lake (or road for that matter) where I have a more
accurately digitized version of? It seems like I should be able to
update/add tags in my own dataset then publish to OSM. Do I delete the
existing version first? or maybe give it the same feature ID as in OSM
and the replacement is done on the back end? </div></blockquote><div><br>In previous imports that have the potential to clobber previous OSM data, we tend to err on the side of the previous data (unless of course you created that previous data and are ok with getting rid of it) simply because it's someone's hard work. Perhaps they actually walked around with a sub-cm GPS and mapped the border of a river, for example. Also, I know that there are several people that have already imported pieces of their local HUCs, so we might want to make sure they are aware of the nationwide import.</div>
</div><br></div>