this is an old topic on talk and never a final agreement. changing the wiki might create big discussions <div>I agree with your definition and use it the same way.</div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Val Kartchner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:val42k@gmail.com">val42k@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">The descriptions on the wiki are quite ambiguous as to when to use path,<br>
track, cycleway, footway or bridleway. There aren't any places around<br>
here that I've tagged as bridleway, so I'll leave that one alone for<br>
now. Otherwise, here is the criteria that I have been using:<br>
<br>
Path: Unpaved, narrow way in the foothills or mountains.<br>
Track: Unpaved, way wide enough for a vehicle.<br>
Cycleway: Paved, usually urban and asphault, way designated for use by<br>
bicycles.<br>
Footway: Paved, usually concrete, way designated primarily for use by<br>
pedestrians.<br>
<br>
Are these good definitions? If so, let's modify the wiki to be<br>
unambiguous.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
- Val -<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>