<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 1/1/11 1:42 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTi=+Gz2ckcRaPyOO+hHCeEMAXQ6MTNGihXim8Uf+@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Richard
Welty <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
can someone point me at examples of well formed County
Boundary<br>
relations in the US? a quick search didn't show anything in
the wiki,<br>
and the boundaries in my part of NY are basically a bunch of<br>
labeled ways with some missing. i'd kind of like to clean it
all up.<br>
<br>
also, for shared boundaries of this type, should we be doing
the<br>
usual thing and consolidating ways and depending on the
relation,<br>
or will doing that break things?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I tried to clean up pieces of Wisconsin in late 2009. Take
a look at relation 270802 and 270801 for examples. I did
consolidate overlapping ways and broke them at points where
the commonality diverged.</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
thanks. the one difference i see is that some of the county
relations<br>
in this area were of type boundary, rather than type multipolygon.<br>
<br>
richard<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>