<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
yes, add to the wiki page and help fix it<br>
<br>
On 6/21/2011 6:56 PM, James Mast wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT141-w18CF1FE9BB1D27A5DB1E55BF500@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">
Steve, are you still accepting other
requests on areas that need to be updated? I would suggest
Northern
Ontario between Toronto and Sudbury. On both the Ontario 69
and
Ontario 11 highway corridors, brand new expressway
alignments are
being built in several different areas. Unfortunately, the
Bing imagery in that area is very
poor and really out dated. The zoom of what is available is
too far
out to even be useful even if the new highways were shown on
it
under-construction. Heck, even Google doesn't have imagery
that shows
the brand newly opened segment of Ontario 69/400 in the
Parry Sound
area. Somebody has already put a rough alignment of it in
OSM, but
it's way off in a few places since I know it's missing an
exit along
it from research on another highway related project I'm
working on.<br>
<br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">-- James </p>
<br>
<br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011
11:26:16
-0700<br>
> From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve@asklater.com">steve@asklater.com</a><br>
> To:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk-us@openstreetmap.org">talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> Subject: [Talk-us] overwhelmed with
responses on the imagery priorities<br>
> <br>
> I had tons of
emails in response to my request for ideas of where we <br>
> could
prioritise imagery. This is not to be taken that we will <br>
>
prioritise based on your input but that's my hope.<br>
> <br>
>
I've put the salient bits of every email in here:<br>
> <br>
>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing/Priorities">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing/Priorities</a><br>
> <br>
>
If you can help me figure this in to a coherent page with
some idea
of <br>
> how to prioritise all the requests that would help me
take this to the <br>
> next stage.<br>
> <br>
> Thanks<br>
>
<br>
> Steve<br>
> <br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us
mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>