<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Ian Dees <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ian.dees@gmail.com">ian.dees@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><div> </div></div><div>Can I suggest that instead you open the TIGER data file as a separate layer in JOSM so you can copy new data from the TIGER layer to the OSM layer. There's no point in tracing from rasters if the data already exists as vectors.</div>
<div class="im">
<div> </div><blockquote style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;" class="gmail_quote">
<div> </div><div>What would be really usefull is to have OSM in one of the geofabrik compare windows and TIGER 2010 in the other. Is there an easy way to achieve this?</div><div> </div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>
I'm working on this. I should have something useful pretty quickly after the new OSM US server gets set up at the new data center some time next week.</div><div> </div></div></blockquote><div>OK, thanks Ian, Yes I'll do it that way. Though it's after Mignight I couldn't resist doing just a couple ot roads. And I find that where the old TIGER had B 1/2 Road, the TIGER 2010 has B 50/100 Road. Does anyone know if this is correct and are they renaming roads in this manner in order to have more possibilities in between? </div>
</div><br>