<html>
<body>
Richard,<br><br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>All good
advice, some of which I can't do because I'm nowhere near El Paso. It
looks like there's no impediment to driving on the "roads," if
anyone would want to. Where they empty onto a paved road, there are some
smears of dirt, so someone is using them. And there don't seems to be
fences or gates.<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>It is
interesting that some actually have names. I wonder what the city or
county government would have to say about this. Might be worth a call (by
me).<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>Do we have
anyone in the El Paso area who might have a ground view of this?<br><br>
--C<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">X-Cloudmark-Score: 0<br>
X-RR-Connecting-IP: 97.74.135.189<br>
Delivered-To: techlady@techlady.com<br>
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=K4+g7lqI c=1 sm=1<br>
a=6ydbDpixB9c9jtIM301iOw==:17 a=dCHQBi5qjXwA:10
a=7onPniHZGCwA:10<br>
a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10
a=PClR7n_LAAAA:8<br>
a=4MJky3HcU8UA:10 a=595fbENkAAAA:8 a=w4L8CiaNGqUigYjJ2EEA:9
a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10<br>
a=BdHZsLrCs2gA:10 a=6ydbDpixB9c9jtIM301iOw==:117<br>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:16:46 -0500<br>
From: Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net><br>
Organization: OpenStreetMap Foundation US Chapter<br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;<br>
rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0<br>
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Ghost suburbs<br>
X-BeenThere: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14<br>
List-Id: OpenStreetMap USA <talk-us.openstreetmap.org><br>
List-Unsubscribe:
<<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/options/talk-us" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/options/talk-us</a>>,<br>
<<a href="mailto:talk-us-request@openstreetmap.org?subject=unsubscribe" eudora="autourl">
mailto:talk-us-request@openstreetmap.org?subject=unsubscribe</a>><br>
List-Archive:
<<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us</a>><br>
List-Post:
<<a href="mailto:talk-us@openstreetmap.org" eudora="autourl">
mailto:talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
List-Help:
<<a href="mailto:talk-us-request@openstreetmap.org?subject=help" eudora="autourl">
mailto:talk-us-request@openstreetmap.org?subject=help</a>><br>
List-Subscribe:
<<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a>>,<br>
<<a href="mailto:talk-us-request@openstreetmap.org?subject=subscribe" eudora="autourl">
mailto:talk-us-request@openstreetmap.org?subject=subscribe</a>><br><br>
On 11/17/12 6:56 AM, Charlotte Wolter wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hello,<br><br>
While doing the Maproulette, I
came upon a large area east of El Paso
(<a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.7234&lon=-106.1106&zoom=13" eudora="autourl">
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.7234&lon=-106.1106&zoom=13</a>
) with hundreds of neatly laid-out roads tagged "residential"
that are only weathered tracks. Apparently, there were plans to build
extensive suburban areas, but they never were built.<br>
How should this be
tagged? Just make them all tracks?<br>
Apologies if this has been
discussed before</blockquote>if they didn't exist, the highway=proposed
would be ok.<br>
but since they exist, i'd go with highway=track<br>
if they never got signs, i'd remove the names, or change the tag to<br>
name_proposed or something like that, but you can't really tell that<br>
from the maproulette vantage point.<br><br>
richard<br><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a></blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
Charlotte Wolter<br>
927 18th Street Suite A<br>
Santa Monica, California<br>
90403<br>
+1-310-597-4040<br>
techlady@techlady.com<br>
Skype: thetechlady<br><br>
<b>The Four Internet Freedoms</b> <br>
Freedom to visit any site on the Internet<br>
Freedom to access any content or service that is not illegal<br>
Freedom to attach any device that does not interfere with the
network<br>
Freedom to know all the terms of a service, particularly any that would
affect the first three freedoms.<br>
</body>
</html>