<div dir="ltr">If that really is the case and he's not welcome to participate in the list, then I agree, it's time for him to find another hobby. Seconded.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Russ Nelson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nelson@crynwr.com" target="_blank">nelson@crynwr.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
He's banned from (at least) this list. Consequently, you cannot expect<br>
him to discuss this issue here.<br>
<br>
We had a discussion of whether to ban him from editing in the past,<br>
which never really got resolved. It just died out. Yes, he's done a<br>
lot of editing, and yes, some of his edits have been fruitful, but no,<br>
some of his edits have been less than helpful. I wouldn't miss him if<br>
he were gone.<br>
<br>
I vote, not that anybody called for a vote, to ask him to leave.<br>
-russ<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
Paul Johnson writes:<br>
> A minor update, since NE2 refuses to handle this as a community:<br>
><br>
> Me: I'm no longer accepting input on this outside of the mailing list. If<br>
> you want to have any further opinion on this, post to the thread in<br>
> talk-us.<br>
> NE2: You know I can't do that. By refusing to discuss you forfeit.<br>
> Me: I'm not going to have this discussion with you someplace you can<br>
> unilaterally<br>
> declare victory independently in a vaccuum, that isn't how OpenStreetMap<br>
> works. You need to follow the thread and sort out your differences with the<br>
> moderators.<br>
><br>
> Again, since the consensus is this restriction is a valid one despite what<br>
> NE2 is suggesting, I intend to revert the deletion. Not sure who our<br>
> dispute management authorities are these days (since I'm not sure it's DWG<br>
> or not), but I'd like to know how to keep them in the loop on this.<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Apollinaris Schöll <<a href="mailto:aschoell@gmail.com">aschoell@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br>
><br>
> > I looked a bit more and in many jurisdiction it's illegal anyway to go<br>
> > around a traffic jam by exiting a freeway and go back direct on the next<br>
> > onramp. Even more reason to have a restriction. Tested Google maps and it<br>
> > will make a big detour to avoid this illegal straight on.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Paul Johnson <<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> >> Good point, though was hoping someone in the Orlando area other than NE2<br>
> >> could weigh in (since this is a rare example of me chasing a Mapdust bug<br>
> >> out to his area).<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Apollinaris Schöll <<a href="mailto:aschoell@gmail.com">aschoell@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br>
> >><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Paul Johnson <<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>>wrote:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>>> NE2 is going on the "World according to NE2" bender again, need a<br>
> >>>> ruling on this relation before I revert:<br>
> >>>> <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811</a><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Turn in question is southbound World Drive at Buena Vista Drive in<br>
> >>>> Orlando, <a href="http://binged.it/128OlwZ" target="_blank">http://binged.it/128OlwZ</a>. Despite left turn only markings on<br>
> >>>> the southbound approach and a flush median gore preventing a straight-on<br>
> >>>> movement, NE2 is of the opinion, and removed the relation, on the excuse<br>
> >>>> that "Anyway, I've deleted the turn restriction, since I cannot recall<br>
> >>>> having seen any signs prohibiting the movement, and you have not seen any<br>
> >>>> such signs because you have not been there." Never mind that the left<br>
> >>>> turn only sign is clearly marked on the pavement. He questioned the legal<br>
> >>>> standing of the marking since it omits "ONLY," despite the fact that<br>
> >>>> section 4.2.1 of the Florida Traffic Engineering Manual requires ONLY to be<br>
> >>>> omitted in situations such as the ramp in question (a straight/left arrow<br>
> >>>> would be required for a through-or-left-turn lane).<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Who's right?<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>> You. it's clearly signed on the pavement. We are no lawyers to challenge<br>
> >>> his interpretation in court. So as long as no one gets a ticket and wins<br>
> >>> the court case it's the right thing to have a restriction.<br>
> >>> And NE2 is known for fighting just for the fight. I come across tons of<br>
> >>> crap from him in areas he has never seen. I fix it and don't even consider<br>
> >>> to contact him.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>> _______________________________________________<br>
> >>>> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> >>>> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> >>>> <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
</div></div> > <div dir="ltr"><div style><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">A minor update, since NE2 refuses to handle this as a community:</span></div><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px"><div><br>
> <span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px"><br></span></div>Me: I'm no longer accepting input on this outside of the mailing list. If you want to have any further opinion on this, post to the thread in talk-us. </span><div><br>
> <span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">NE2: You know I can't do that. By refusing to discuss you forfeit.</span></div><div style><font face="Helvetica Neue, Arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14px;line-height:23px">Me: </span></font><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">I'm not going to have this discussion with you someplace you can</span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px"> </span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">unilaterally declare victory independently in a vaccuum, that isn't how</span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px"> </span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">OpenStreetMap works. You need to follow the thread and sort out your</span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px"> </span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">differences with the moderators.</span></div><br>
> <div style><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px"><br></span></div><div style><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:23px">Again, since the consensus is this restriction is a valid one despite what NE2 is suggesting, I intend to revert the deletion. Not sure who our dispute management authorities are these days (since I'm not sure it's DWG or not), but I'd like to know how to keep them in the loop on this.</span></div><br>
> </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Apollinaris Schöll <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:<a href="mailto:aschoell@gmail.com">aschoell@gmail.com</a>" target="_blank"><a href="mailto:aschoell@gmail.com">aschoell@gmail.com</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><br>
> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I looked a bit more and in many jurisdiction it's illegal anyway to go around a traffic jam by exiting a freeway and go back direct on the next onramp. Even more reason to have a restriction. Tested Google maps and it will make a big detour to avoid this illegal straight on.<div class="HOEnZb"><br>
> <div class="h5"><br><br>
> <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Paul Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>" target="_blank"><a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
><br>
> <div dir="ltr">Good point, though was hoping someone in the Orlando area other than NE2 could weigh in (since this is a rare example of me chasing a Mapdust bug out to his area).</div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>
> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Apollinaris Schöll <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:<a href="mailto:aschoell@gmail.com">aschoell@gmail.com</a>" target="_blank"><a href="mailto:aschoell@gmail.com">aschoell@gmail.com</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
><br>
><br>
> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Paul Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>" target="_blank"><a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> <div dir="ltr">NE2 is going on the "World according to NE2" bender again, need a ruling on this relation before I revert: <a href="<a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811</a>" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811</a></a><div><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> <br></div><div>Turn in question is southbound World Drive at Buena Vista Drive in Orlando, <a href="<a href="http://binged.it/128OlwZ" target="_blank">http://binged.it/128OlwZ</a>" target="_blank"><a href="http://binged.it/128OlwZ" target="_blank">http://binged.it/128OlwZ</a></a>. Despite left turn only markings on the southbound approach and a flush median gore preventing a straight-on movement, NE2 is of the opinion, and removed the relation, on the excuse that "<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Anyway, I've deleted the turn restriction, since I cannot recall having seen any signs prohibiting the movement, and you have not seen any such signs because you have not been there.</span>" Never mind that the left turn only sign is clearly marked on the pavement. He questioned the legal standing of the marking since it omits "ONLY," despite the fact that section 4.2.1 of the Florida Traffic Engineering Manual requires ONLY to be omitted in situations such as the ramp in question (a straight/left arrow would be required for a through-or-left-turn lane).</div><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> <div><br></div><div>Who's right?</div></div><br>
> <br></blockquote></div></div><div><br>You. it's clearly signed on the pavement. We are no lawyers to challenge his interpretation in court. So as long as no one gets a ticket and wins the court case it's the right thing to have a restriction.<br><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> And NE2 is known for fighting just for the fight. I come across tons of crap from him in areas he has never seen. I fix it and don't even consider to contact him.<br> </div><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br><br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br><br>
> <a href="mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>" target="_blank"><a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a></a><br><br>
> <a href="<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a>" target="_blank"><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a></a><br><br>
> <br></blockquote></div></div><br><br>
> </blockquote></div><br></div><br>
> </div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>
> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> > _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>