<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Talk-us] Removing US Bicycle Route
tags</title></head><body>
<div>To breathe a little fresh air into this discussion (and perhaps
pour a little oil on troubled waters): I have enjoyed in the
last few hours some email exchanges with both Kerry and Paul.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>In short, Kerry and I are discussing how it is inappropriate for
OCM to display a USBR as a proposed ncn when the ACA is still in the
"corridor only" phase, and no SPECIFIC route exists. I
think she and I agree there. In some of those cases, there is an
existing STATE (rcn) route (which MAY become a USBR/ncn) and so it
seems the correct response is to change those from ncn/proposed to
rcn/actual. If/as the state adopts the state route as a specific
USBR, (initially as proposed, perhaps paralleling the existing rcn,
perhaps not), it can then be promoted, or another relation in OSM can
capture this for display in OCM.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Does this make everybody happy? Consensus is important,
even critical, in OSM.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>SteveA</div>
<div>California</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM,
KerryIrons <<a
href="mailto:irons54vortex@sbcglobal.net">irons54vortex@sbcglobal.net</a
>> wrote:
<blockquote>You really are making this personal Paul, but I don't
understand why.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>That's not the intent.<br>
<blockquote>I only asked that those who might want to help clean up
the mis-tagged routes</blockquote>
<blockquote>could contact me directly. Is that some sort of OSM
violation?</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Not in so much as itself, but given that
this is a community project, your audience is the community
collaboration, not the individual.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>