<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Darrell Fuhriman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:darrell@garnix.org" target="_blank">darrell@garnix.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>You'd end up with this:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://bostonography.com/images/misc/neighborhoods_labeled.jpg" target="_blank">http://bostonography.com/images/misc/neighborhoods_labeled.jpg</a></div>

<div><br></div><div>Discussed here:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://bostonography.com/2012/wanted-your-map-of-boston-neighborhoods/" target="_blank">http://bostonography.com/2012/wanted-your-map-of-boston-neighborhoods/</a></div>

</blockquote></div><br>True. I suppose part of it is wanting to be associated with a more desirable neighborhood. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">One of the advantages of just using a neighborhood node is not having to have fixed boundaries. If we got survey results back we could then average the results to find a center point for the node. Fuzzy logic anyone?</div>

<div class="gmail_extra"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Clifford</div><div><br></div><div>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch</div>
</div></div>