<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body>My city kindly places identification signs along the borders of many of the defined neighborhoods. Other neighborhoods are coterminous with a particular subdivision.<br>
<br>
Still others like "midtown" are mean whatever the person saying it wants it to mean.<br>
<br>
The former are reasonable to map. The latter is not.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Ian Dees <ian.dees@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Bryce Cogswell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bryceco@yahoo.com" target="_blank">bryceco@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br /><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Your entire argument is based on the premise that neighborhood boundaries are subjective and unverifiable, and while that may be true for your neighborhood it is not true for mine. So why shouldn't I map what I can easily verify on the ground?</blockquote>
<div><br /></div><div style="style">What are you using to verify your neighborhood boundaries? Is there literally a line on the pavement showing the boundaries?</div></div></div></div>
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px"><hr /><br />Talk-us mailing list<br />Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html></body></html>