<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Nathan Mills <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nathan@nwacg.net" target="_blank">nathan@nwacg.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class="im">The sort of signs in the link below are precisely the sort of thing we put in OSM, or at least have historically.</div>
<a href="https://www.cityoftulsa.org/community-programs/neighborhoods/neighborhood-sign-guide.aspx" target="_blank">https://www.cityoftulsa.org/<u></u>community-programs/<u></u>neighborhoods/neighborhood-<u></u>sign-guide.aspx</a></blockquote>

<div><br></div><div>There is certainly no problem mapping the <i>sign</i>. </div><div>The sign is verifiable & objective.</div><div>And the data is indexable and useful to map users, not just to mappers.</div></div>