<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><br> <BR><div>> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:40:22 -0400<br>> From: phil_g@pobox.com<br>> To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering<br>> <br>> * James Mast <rickmastfan67@hotmail.com> [2013-07-10 09:22 -0400]:<br>> > I could "fix" the PA Turnpike relation with the "US:PA:Turnpike" network<br>> > tag in a moment. Would that work instead of just "fixing" the name tags<br>> > for both directions?<br>> <br>> That wouldn't affect my rendering as it currently stands. The rendering,<br>> right now, will only make a shields for a relation with the exact name<br>> "Pennsylvania Turnpike".</div><div> </div><div>Is it possible that it could take the "name" from the "Super" relation for both directions? I didn't put the word "(super)" In it.</div><div><a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/270032">http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/270032</a></div><div> </div><div>Also, how will you deal with the PA Turnpike's NE Extension which also should have the shields on it? Before today, it didn't have a relation (just the base I-476 one) till I added it. However, I did split it up with a relation for each direction, and then a super tying it up together.</div><div><a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3075654">http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3075654</a></div><div> </div><div>Or maybe you could somehow tweak your script to "ignore" anything in "()" in the name tag? That might be the best solution here, IMO.</div><div> </div><div>-James<br></div> </div></body>
</html>