<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?<BR> <BR>-James<br> <BR><div>> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 -0400<br>> From: kkenny2@nycap.rr.com<br>> To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations<br>> <br>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold <phil_g@pobox.com> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:<br>> ><br>> > network=US:I:Future<br>> > ref=<number><br>> > modifier=Future<br>> ><br>> > and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd<br>> > recommend tagging as above.<br>> ><br>> > Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73,<br>> > 74, and<br>> > 840. Are there any others?<br>> <br>> 86 in New York, so signed for various segments of NY 17.<br>> https://www.dot.ny.gov/regional-offices/multi/i-86<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Talk-us mailing list<br>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us<br></div> </div></body>
</html>