<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/14/13 1:52 PM, Ian Dees wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAG91b3QsHGaxUU1=NuHwf3_xaVZR8RkEJaQ7WgkGTuMnAom=MQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM,
            Martijn van Exel <span dir="ltr"><<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:martijnv@telenav.com" target="_blank">martijnv@telenav.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote">Hi all,<br>
              <br>
              Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex
              intersections and we<br>
              have set about editing some of these intersections in a
              way we feel<br>
              represents the situation on the ground better than their
              original<br>
              state, and because of that, works better for us. We have
              received some<br>
              feedback on our edits so we wanted to take a step back and
              see what we<br>
              (as the OSM community) think is the preferred way to map
              these<br>
              intersections.<br>
              <br>
              So what are we talking about? Intersections like this one,
              where one<br>
              or more dual carriageways come together at an at-grade
              intersection:<br>
              <br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/6438c196-bb92-4f66-81dc-9b75186286ba/0e8f07ff527c6a85c0dec426b9b79f1e"
                target="_blank">https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/6438c196-bb92-4f66-81dc-9b75186286ba/0e8f07ff527c6a85c0dec426b9b79f1e</a><br>
              <br>
              One of my colleagues at Telenav has remapped this
              intersection as follows:<br>
              <br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/3491f1fe-6afa-4571-bc43-7cb31c9c2625/9dd47d1445fdcf03d3f0bbd93b8e0f92"
                target="_blank">https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/3491f1fe-6afa-4571-bc43-7cb31c9c2625/9dd47d1445fdcf03d3f0bbd93b8e0f92</a></blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>I've seen more examples of your "after" photo than the
              "before" in my mapping. I create them by default when dual
              carriageways intersect.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>+1 you're doing the right thing.</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    i consider the "after" a better approach as well.<br>
    <br>
    richard<br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>