<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 07.11.2013 06:20, schrieb Bryce
Cogswell:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:05829363-7046-4A17-A0C6-7B0F2F2F0D5B@yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<div>I have to agree with Jason on this as well. Admin borders are
some of the most important cartographic information on the
planet, to the extent that wars are fought over them, and are
easily verified through dozens of independent sources. To
exclude them from OSM on the basis of a "ground verifiable"
ideology seems silly.</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
I will just note that nobody advocated "excluding" borders from OSM,
in fact just the other way around. The discussion is about how they
technically should be included in OSM, not about soapboxes.<br>
</body>
</html>