<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>All right, I'll be sending the e-mail to the DWG in a few minutes then. Life has been a little crazy here preventing me from doing it sooner than this.<br><br>-James<br><br><div>> From: martijn@openstreetmap.us<br>> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:07:48 -0800<br>> To: rickmastfan67@hotmail.com<br>> CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload<br>> <br>> I think you're making the right call, James.<br>> <br>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:33 PM, James Mast <rickmastfan67@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > So, nobody else has a comment on how the repair work should be done?<br>> ><br>> > Last chance before I respond back to the DWG e-mail (and as of right now,<br>> > will be recommending just the reverting of only the 'highway=xxx' upgrades).<br>> > Just want to make sure the masses don't have a problem with this.<br>> ><br>> > -James<br>> ><br>> > ________________________________<br>> > From: rickmastfan67@hotmail.com<br>> > To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> > Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:01:19 -0500<br>> ><br>> > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload<br>> ><br>> > Nobody else has a comment on what should be done here?<br>> ><br>> > If you don't remember the start of this discussion of this subject, here's<br>> > the link to the original post I made on this subject to the list so you can<br>> > see it:<br>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-December/012349.html<br>> ><br>> > -James<br>> ><br>> >> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:24:50 -0500<br>> >> From: niceman@att.net<br>> >> To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> >> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload<br>> >><br>> >> On 1/16/2014 12:16 AM, James Mast wrote:<br>> >> > Anyways guys, post what you think should be done here so I can get back<br>> >> > to the DWG on this subject. (I'm personally all for the reverting of<br>> >> > the highway=xxx upgrades this user has done only and not a full scale<br>> >> > revert of all his changesets as he did do some highway cleanup in some<br>> >> > changesets while doing the 'highway=xxx' upgrades.)<br>> >><br>> >> I would be for the revert of the highway=xxx changes. While the Wiki<br>> >> has no hard and fast rule on the 'right way' to tag these, clearly some<br>> >> information has been lost by eliminating a highway type.<br>> >><br>> >> _______________________________________________<br>> >> Talk-us mailing list<br>> >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list<br>> > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Talk-us mailing list<br>> > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us<br>> ><br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> Martijn van Exel<br>> President, US Chapter<br>> OpenStreetMap<br>> http://openstreetmap.us/<br>> http://osm.org/<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Talk-us mailing list<br>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us<br></div> </div></body>
</html>