<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Thank you Frederik. Really appreciate it.<br><br>-James<br><br><div>> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:59:57 +0100<br>> From: frederik@remote.org<br>> To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload<br>> <br>> All,<br>> <br>> On 09.12.2013 06:42, James Mast wrote:<br>> > Is it just me, or are there way too many primary state highways when<br>> > some of them should really be secondary instead? <br>> <br>> After this discussion has now more or less concluded that we should be<br>> reverting the edits in question, I have compiled a list of all highways<br>> where user mjbyars has changed the highway type at some point in the<br>> past, and reverted them to the previous highway type. Only the highway<br>> tag was changed in this process, everything else remained in the current<br>> state.<br>> <br>> The revert changeset is this:<br>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20401446<br>> <br>> There may be some situations where a way was split by the user (which to<br>> the database looks like a modification of one way and a new creation of<br>> another); in these cases, the new highway will likely still be of the<br>> former (higher) highway type and not be reverted. So if you do spot the<br>> odd remnant of "primary overload", please do fix it by hand.<br>> <br>> Bye<br>> Frederik<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Talk-us mailing list<br>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us<br></div> </div></body>
</html>