<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-06-23 8:41 PM, Paul Johnson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAMPM96ohJRGysLPzr=wgv9J=k0CwD0NK2-dEHTHTpbQ4bb2Z-Q@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr"><span
style="color:rgb(64,64,64);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:18.200000762939453px">Supreme
          Court rules for a second time that indian nations are domestic
          dependent nations with inherent sovereign authority.  This
          affirms that indian reservations are higher than the state
          level, lower than the federal level.</span><br
style="color:rgb(64,64,64);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:18.200000762939453px">
        <br
style="color:rgb(64,64,64);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:18.200000762939453px">
        <div><span
style="color:rgb(64,64,64);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:18.200000762939453px">This
            sounds like the SCOTUS just reaffirmed a case for indian
            reservations being tagged as admin_level=3, if we're tagging
            for accurate status and not for the renderer.  Thoughts?</span></div>
        <div><span
style="color:rgb(64,64,64);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:18.200000762939453px"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div><font color="#404040" face="Roboto, arial, sans-serif"><span
              style="line-height:18.200000762939453px"><a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Mich_v_Bay_Mills_Indian_Cmty_No_12515_US_May_27_2014_Court_Opinio">http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Mich_v_Bay_Mills_Indian_Cmty_No_12515_US_May_27_2014_Court_Opinio</a></span></font><br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Having read through the decision, it's about tribal immunity for
    acts outside Indian* territory.<br>
    <br>
    Do you propose cutting the areas out of the states, i.e. so that IRs
    are not in any admin_level=4 relations? That's what you have to do
    if you're fitting IRs into the admin_level hierarchy.<br>
    <br>
    * The term used in the legal case<br>
  </body>
</html>