<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Serge Wroclawski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:emacsen@gmail.com" target="_blank">emacsen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":a9e" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">Thanks for the pointer. I think you're right that in this case<br>
especially, there's no reason to admonish anyone, but perhaps we can<br>
examine the data and see if there's a safe way to expand it, like we<br>
did the TIGER data.<br>
<br>
That may also explain some large portion of the contractions I found.<br>
Maybe it's worth trying to map them....</div></blockquote></div><br>I agree with Serge and Toby's post - this is old data that should be fixed.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I pulled the data from a Mapzen city extract (San Diego & Tijuana). There are 488,571 address points. Looking at OSMI, the whole area has addresses with abbreviated street names. </div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Serge, anything I can do to help you with the expansion bot, just let me know. Knowing how to do this would help me down the road as we try to figure out how to update address info from my local county.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Clifford<br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>@osm_seattle<br></div><div><a href="http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us" target="_blank">osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us</a></div>
<div>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch</div></div>
</div></div>