<div dir="ltr">Yeah, the consensus on the lists was to always use the postal abbreviation for the state. Kansas and Colorado also tend to refer on the signs to "C 149" or "K 66" but are generally tagged CO 149 or KS 66...</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Brad Neuhauser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brad.neuhauser@gmail.com" target="_blank">brad.neuhauser@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">This has probably come up in the past, but Michigan's state highways are signed and referred to as "M ##" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Michigan_Highways" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Michigan_Highways</a> <br><br>It's also mentioned on <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan/Highway_Relations" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan/Highway_Relations</a>, which differentiates between the network abbreviations and way refs<br></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Paul Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Also sounds like M-3, M-10, etc should probably be tagged MI 3, MI 10...</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:11 PM, James Mast <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rickmastfan67@hotmail.com" target="_blank">rickmastfan67@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>
<div><div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Just thought I'd give you guys a heads up, but there is a user going around and adding '-' to all the ref tags he modifies in Michigan.<br><br>A good example would be a good chunk of I-75 [1], I-96, M-3, M-10 in Metro Detroit. But he's done it elsewhere in Michigan.<br><br>I sent him a PM earlier mentioning this as a 'FYI' that we don't add the '-' to the ref tags. Hopefully he'll respond. Otherwise, this might be a massive cleanup. Anybody else want to try and get a hold of this user as well? I have also noticed that in some places where he has 'tweaked' the ref tags, others have done some 'reverting' work already putting them back to the normal standard. [2]<br><br>-James<br><br>[1] - <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8767860/history" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8767860/history</a><br>[2] - <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17729896/history" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17729896/history</a><br><br></div>
</div></div>
<br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>