<div dir="ltr">I'm willing to argue both cases. Having a role=label relation may be useful where it may be otherwise ambiguous to properly form a cogent label. However, in the Hollywood sign's case, just rendering each letter as a label would be obvious to most people (albeit somewhat unusual) and helpful (since it's possible navigate in Hollywood relative to the H and the D in that sign, something that I generally do to orient myself since, despite having lived just over the hills in the valley for a number of years, I never learned the street names out of a lack of need).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-11-27 18:04 GMT+01:00 Brad Neuhauser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brad.neuhauser@gmail.com" target="_blank">brad.neuhauser@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Could you include the new node in the relation as role=label? That's at least somewhat documented...</blockquote></div><br><br><br></div></span><div class="gmail_extra">mapping "labels" is generally disputed, as a label is something the dataconsumer creates to display information, it is not actual information to describe the world, that would belong into the osm database.<br><br>cheers,<br>Martin<br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>