<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Talk-us] access road routing - two real world
cases</title></head><body>
<div>Harald Kliems <kliems@gmail.com> writes:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>I don't think that this is a tagging but
a routing problem. It seems easy enough to me to program a router
"do not use roads with access=private unless they are the first
or last segment of a route" or something along those
lines.</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>RE: access=destination. Not sure
what the convention is in the US, but in Germany this is mainly
used for public roads open only to people living or having business to
do on the road, usually to prevent through-traffic. There is an
official road sign for this <a
href=
"http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anlieger#mediaviewer/File:Zusatzzeichen_1020-30.svg"><span
></span
>http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anlieger#mediaviewer/File:Zusatzzeichen<span
></span>_1020-30.svg</a> </blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Right, Harald. I agree that access=destination is quite
useful as it has exactly that semantic meaning. But it doesn't
seem too far a stretch to ask it to enclose "if you MUST use
(route to) this roadway to achieve your destination, go ahead and
include it in your route" as well.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>SteveA</div>
<div>California</div>
</body>
</html>