<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div style="color: black;">
<div style="color: black;">
<p style="margin: 0 0 1em 0; color: black;">The equivalent sign in
the USA states either "No Thru Traffic" or "Local Traffic Only". While the
standard written spelling is "through", the shortened spelling "Thru" is
standard on road signs.</p>
<p style="margin: 0 0 1em 0; color: black;">-- <br>
John F. Eldredge -- john@jfeldredge.com<br>
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.<br>
</p>
</div>
<div style="color: black;">
<p
style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; margin: 10pt 0;">On
January 1, 2015 5:01:07 PM Harald Kliems <kliems@gmail.com> wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" class="gmail_quote"
style="margin: 0 0 0 0.75ex; border-left: 1px solid #808080; padding-left: 0.75ex;">I
don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems easy
enough to me to program a router "do not use roads with access=private
unless they are the first or last segment of a route" or something
along those lines. <div><br></div><div>RE: access=destination. Not sure
what the convention is in the US, but in Germany this is mainly used for
public roads open only to people living or having business to do on the
road, usually to prevent through-traffic. There is an official road sign
for this <a
href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anlieger#mediaviewer/File:Zusatzzeichen_1020-30.svg">http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anlieger#mediaviewer/File:Zusatzzeichen_1020-30.svg</a> <br></div><div><br></div><div> Harald.</div><br><div
class="gmail_quote">On Thu Jan 01 2015 at 1:40:52 PM stevea <<a
href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com">steveaOSM@softworkers.com</a>>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">>i
suppose OSM could use access=permissive for<br>
>the preferred route, but that usage doesn't match<br>
>well with the current language for permissive.<br>
<br>
Richard, I'm not sure this is a perfect solution, but it could work.<br>
What about using access=destination ("Only when travelling to this<br>
element...") on that segment where traffic should be "directed
to" by<br>
a router, then adding a rule to the router to be sensitive to<br>
access=destination segments? This would actually solve the problem<br>
and make the router even better than for just this exact case.<br>
However, while it might overload the semantics for<br>
access=destination, through careful implementation of the router<br>
rule, it could improve it.<br>
<br>
SteveA<br>
California<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org"
target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us"
target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<u></u>org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a class="aqm-autolink aqm-autowrap"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>