<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/8/15 9:43 PM, James Mast wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT146-W281FC07D7F643B3E0764D3BF440@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1">
<div dir="ltr">A user today just happened to change the
'Carnot-Moon' [1] ways [2] and relation boundary [3] from a
'boundary=administrative' 'admin_level=8' to 'boundary=census'.
Is this the correct way we have been tagging stuff like this?
I've pretty much stayed away from these types of edits (unless
it's something obvious that needs to be reverted), and was just
curious to what the rest of the US was doing before I either
reverted the changesets this was done in, or contact the user
(or if somebody who has more 'knowledge' on these types of edits
wants to contact him instead, be my guest).<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
i think this is the direction we need to move in, although not
necessarily<br>
boundary=census<br>
<br>
CDP boundaries are not legal boundaries and there is no
administrative<br>
function associated with them.<br>
<br>
boundary=statistical<br>
<br>
might be a more general approach.<br>
<br>
richard<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search</pre>
</body>
</html>