<div dir="ltr">I did a quick fix for the hole in the Denver, Denver County and Adams county relations. I may take another look at the area tonight. I saw a few oddities although I don't think they are related to your edit. I don't think way 321010352 should have aeroway tags on it since it is a member of a relation with those tags. There is also an odd multipolygon relation (112849) in the area that I suspect is mostly a duplicate of the Aurora boundary.<div><br></div><div>Toby</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Jim McAndrew <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jim@loc8.us" target="_blank">jim@loc8.us</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Kristen,<div><br></div><div>If nobody else takes this on, I can look at it this weekend.</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Jim</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Kam, Kristen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kristenk@telenav.com" target="_blank">kristenk@telenav.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Good Morning OSMers,<br>
<br>
A Telenav data integrity check picked up geometry issues associated with the Denver International Airport Route relation. We found that the culprit was the following changesets:<br>
<br>
* <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27705328" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27705328</a><br>
* <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27713462" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27713462</a><br>
<br>
I contacted the user who said essentially said the changesets were committed accidentally and didn't know how to reverse them. In any case, I reverted the deletions by creating _new_ OSM ways that are duplicates (tags & geometries) of the ways that were deleted. The two ways are:<br>
<br>
*Denver International Airport (321010352, v1)<br>
*321010349, v1<br>
<br>
These new ways (321010352, 321010349) are duplicates of ways that were part of the following relations:<br>
<br>
*Adams County (1411346)<br>
*Denver County (1411339)<br>
*Denver (253750)<br>
*Denver International Airport (112192)<br>
<br>
I went ahead and added the new ways to the Denver International Airport relation member list. However, I am not very confident on reconstructing the other boundary relations' member lists. That said, I am writing to ask if anyone can pitch in on fixing the other four relations. Thank you in advance!<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Kristen<br>
---<br>
Kristen Kam<br>
OSM Profile → <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/KristenK" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/KristenK</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>