<div dir="ltr">That is what I thought as well. It is now gone. If I didn't screw up the boundary multipolygons everything should be correct. (I hate boundaries!!!)<div><br></div><div>Thanks for the help,</div><div>Clifford</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Steven Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sejohnson8@gmail.com" target="_blank">sejohnson8@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Yes, U.S. Census Bureau treats them as statistical, not aim boundaries.<br>
<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
--SEJ<br>
<br>
Sent from my electronic tether.<br>
<br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 2015年5月19日, at 21:33, stevea <<a href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com">steveaOSM@softworkers.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>> On 5/19/15 Richard Welty <<a href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>> they probably shouldn't be in an administrative boundary category anyway,<br>
>> as they don't have any sort of local governance function.<br>
><br>
> Agreed, +1. I've been similarly locally blurring out (away from importance or relevance in OSM) and/or diminishing CDP boundaries as I do listen here.<br>
><br>
> Many of these are in OSM yet they might be seen as they are, especially as/when combined with administrative boundary. In short, census delineations are not administrative, rather, more like a statistical approximation. What that particular census formula purports to denote might be debated, though that seems tedious.<br>
><br>
> At a certain point we start to do cartwheels around Monte Carlo simulations regarding Constitutional questions getting asked. Let's check that and continue.<br>
><br>
> SteveA<br>
> California<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>@osm_seattle<br></div><div><a href="http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us" target="_blank">osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us</a></div><div>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch</div></div></div>
</div>