<div dir="ltr">Just to reinforce what has already been said, here's what the Census thinks of CDPs:<br><div><br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Census Designated Places (CDPs)</span><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"> are
the statistical counterparts of incorporated places, and are<b> delineated
to provide data for settled concentrations of population that are
identifiable by name but are not legally incorporated</b> under the laws of
the state in which they are located. The boundaries usually are
defined in cooperation with local or tribal officials and generally
updated prior to each decennial census. <b>These boundaries, which
usually coincide with visible features or the boundary of an adjacent
incorporated place or another legal entity boundary, have no legal
status, nor do these places have officials elected to serve traditional
municipal functions</b>. CDP boundaries may change from one decennial
census to the next with changes in the settlement pattern; a CDP with
the same name as in an earlier census does not necessarily have the same
boundary. CDPs must be contained within a single state and may not
extend into an incorporated place. There are no population size
requirements for CDPs.</span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_place.html" target="_blank">https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_place.html</a><br><br></div><div>Actual local administrative entities tend to be Places and sometimes County Subdivisions, but it really varies by state. If you want to dig that deep, you can view info about each state's census geography here: <a href="https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/geoguide.html">https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/geoguide.html</a> </div><div><br></div><div>Brad<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Serge Wroclawski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:emacsen@gmail.com" target="_blank">emacsen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I agree with Rich Welty- if you know the area and the CDP boundary<br>
makes no sense, then remove it.<br>
<br>
The issue in the past has been where some people wanted to remove all of them.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
- Serge<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow <<a href="mailto:clifford@snowandsnow.us">clifford@snowandsnow.us</a>> wrote:<br>
> I would like to remove Machias, Washington admin_level 8 since it does not<br>
> exist as a city in Washington. It has been there for a number of years<br>
> apparently added by a bot. I plan to leave it as a CDP locality node. There<br>
> doesn't seem to be any chance that it will become a city and will most<br>
> likely be annex by Lake Stevens.<br>
><br>
> Before I do I'd like to hear people opinion about deleting these<br>
> admin_level=8 for CDP boundaries.<br>
><br>
> Clifford<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> @osm_seattle<br>
> <a href="http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us" target="_blank">osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us</a><br>
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch<br>
><br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>