<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on
OSM?</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>
<blockquote>On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Shawn K. Quinn <<a
href="mailto:skquinn@rushpost.com">skquinn@rushpost.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
In urban areas, it makes no sense to try to map residential
driveways</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>It sounds cliché, but you ought to believe it: I go to
parties like that. When I check my GPS, I like to see these in a
map that works. Say, at night. So here I agree with Paul,
I suppose we both go to parties like that. Lots do.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>As I see driveways (in Bing, for example), especially as I know
the area and think "good to know that" I'll put them in our
map. Good to know that, especially as you can see that.
Whew, I thought I was going to have to walk the long way around the
park, at night! I am glad when I find these. We have Civil
Code 1008 (permission to pass on private property vs. is/is becoming
right-of-way) in our state, so pay attention to the signs. These
become access= tags.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Tag what you see. Tag what is. This isn't difficult.
Maybe sometimes a little ambiguous or confusing, and so kind of
discussion prone, but we have here to untangle things. Doing so
even works much of the time!</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>SteveA</div>
<div>California</div>
</body>
</html>