<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Ian Butler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mypublic@runbox.com" target="_blank">mypublic@runbox.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Another possibility for state park boundary shp files might be the Oklahoma Protected Areas Database at the Oklahoma Biological Survey.<br>
I have not seen this data; but I worked on the original public lands layer for the Oklahoma GAP project.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://biosurvey.ou.edu/PAD/PAD.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://biosurvey.ou.edu/PAD/PAD.html</a><br>
<br>
"PAD-OK is an aggregated dataset, incorporating data as provided by land owners, administrators, or best available sources.<br>
Inconsistencies in data quality and scale may be present. Because of possible data inconsistencies, PAD-OK is best for landscape<br>
level analysis (1:100,000 or greater)..."<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Excellent! I'm able to read this. It's not <i>quite</i> in alignment, but it's close enough that I can conflate it easily on a case by case basis. But, looking at <a href="http://www.ou.edu/content/publicaffairs/webpolicies/termsofuse.html">http://www.ou.edu/content/publicaffairs/webpolicies/termsofuse.html</a>, I'm wondering if this is even a dataset that we can use, or if it's just typical boilerplate that is nullified by the Open Records Act.</div></div><br></div></div>