<div dir="ltr">I'd go with ref_unsigned on that, just to be orthagonal with other unsigned refs (like Oregon's state highways as opposed to state, US and Interstate routes; or Oklahoma's unsigned 0, 00 and 000).<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Albert Pundt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roadsguy99@gmail.com" target="_blank">roadsguy99@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">It also allows for ref:legislative to be used (much like ref:penndot throughout Pennsylvania) in states that still use these separate legislative routes.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 8:49 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com" target="_blank">steveaOSM@softworkers.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">BTW, I'm all for your old_ref_legislative -> old_ref:legislative proposal. It seems it would harmonize tags in the East and West (of the USA).<br>
<br>
Briefly (my reasoning is): combining tagging conventions with tagging conventions growth = growth in OSM. It is surprising how resolving small syntax and semantics blurs like these truly helps everything!<br>
<br>
Steve</blockquote></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="m_-811847596169588023m_-3771212920717932921gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">—Albert<br></div></div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>