<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    Joseph,   I'm not stuck on class 27, but as you say, that fits the
    definition on the wiki.   I should probably look for other specific
    protection in the attributes and translate that somehow.   Mostly
    it's just grazing and recreation land.   Anything such as wilderness
    or monument would definitely be tagged as such.<br>
    <br>
    Martijn,  Gaia is not available on a Garmin, or on a PC.  It also
    costs $40 a yr.   Why do you trust Gaia as an authoritative source?
      How often do they update from government sources?   BLM boundaries
    do not change very often.  Probably less often than city/town
    boundaries.     For an authoritative source, I have national forest
    maps that are 10 - 20 years old.  A download today from a federal
    database is way better than that and in 5 years will probably still
    be just as good.    In relatively sparsely populated areas, on the
    ground verification does not work as well as it does in the city.   
    If we make OSM more useful for more people then more folks will get
    involved.      <br>
    <br>
    Michael,   You bring up some good questions which I don't have the
    answer for yet.   I would get started with what you call the low
    road, state sized or smaller pieces at a time.  A quick look at the
    boundaries around me show none that follow a watercourse or a ridge,
    they are all straight lines and and square corners.  The extraneous
    ways at state boundaries look like artifacts from cutting up a
    larger database into state size chunks.  There was no polygon, or a
    skinny polygon associated with those artifacts.  I'm guessing that
    there is BLM land in the adjacent state.<br>
    <br>
    Dave, Thanks for being a voice of reason!  <br>
    <br>
    Brad<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/6/19 3:36 AM, Dave Swarthout
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKWFYhX_a-F4uTB6bQYdnrygRtKVu=0PRtw+RNvMDm+kd8Jz6g@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Ian Dees wrote:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>>"Those things shouldn't be in OSM either"</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Are you implying that because such boundaries (National
          Forests, National Parks and National Wildlife Refuges) are
          non-verifiable by OSM mappers they don't belong in OSM? If so,
          wow!<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I live in Alaska where about 60% of the land area is
          included in one or the other of these categories and I firmly
          believe they must be included in OSM. No, the boundaries
          aren't verifiable nor are they particularly accurate but
          actually nothing we put into OSM is accurate within several
          meters at best. If I add a National Wildlife Refuge having a
          total area of thousands of sq. kilometers and boundary errors
          amount to a few dozen sq km, for example, that doesn't bother
          me one bit. At least it's there for people to see. I'm really
          not looking for super accuracy; what I want are the visible
          outlines of those protected areas, be they rough estimates or
          not. OSM makes no warranty concerning accuracy. If you want to
          build a home near a NP or NWR boundary you'll need a surveyor;
          our rough boundaries won't serve for that purpose.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Can you elaborate on your statement, please?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Dave<br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr">On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 2:05 PM Martijn van Exel
          <<a href="mailto:m@rtijn.org" moz-do-not-send="true">m@rtijn.org</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">Brad — I make use of
            BLM / NPS / NF boundary data a lot too. I use Gaia GPS for
            this, which overlays this data nicely with what’s in OSM[1].
            There are lots of other outdoor apps that do the same. I
            prefer this data live outside of OSM as well for similar
            reasons as Ian stated. Knowing whether land is public or
            private or whether it’s inside or outside a NP, is important
            to me when I’m in the outdoors. I would much rather rely on
            an authoritative definition of these boundaries, than on
            whatever happens to be in OSM. Since there is no
            on-the-ground verifiability, boundary data is prone to
            growing stale, as you can see happening with census place
            boundaries. Unreliable data in this case is worse than no
            data at all.
            <div>If you’re looking to make a great impact on the map as
              an outdoors user, I would suggest mapping things you know
              and things you observe when you’re out there. Countless
              times have I been out in the middle of nowhere, to find
              that some mapper before me added a landmark, a water
              source, or something else that really helped me. That is
              what I like to pay forward.</div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Martijn</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>[1] <a href="https://www.gaiagps.com/offroad/#maps"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.gaiagps.com/offroad/#maps</a> </div>
                <div>
                  <div><br>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div>On Jan 5, 2019, at 8:43 PM, brad <<a
                          href="mailto:bradhaack@fastmail.com"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bradhaack@fastmail.com</a>>
                        wrote:</div>
                      <br
                        class="gmail-m_3774089849952339796Apple-interchange-newline">
                      <div>
                        <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Ian, <br>
                          I want to import this data because I think its
                          important for a complete map.   We have
                          national forest, wilderness  and national park
                          boundaries in OSM!   This is no different.  
                          If you look at many maps they show all of
                          them.<br>
                          <br>
                          I'd like it to show up on any map that I
                          use.   I'm working on a 'better' version for
                          garmin using mkgmap.   I hope it gets rendered
                          with OpenAndroMaps too.   I haven't used the
                          onine <a href="http://osm.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">osm.org</a>
                          map very much.<br>
                          <br>
                          I am excited to participate and improve OSM
                          and in my opinion this is a big gap in the OSM
                          database.   Where I live, we don't use OSM for
                          building footprints, we use it to find our way
                          in the national forest, the BLM land and the
                          national parks.   It's very useful to know
                          what is public or private land.<br>
                          <br>
                          Brad <br>
                          <br>
                          <div
                            class="gmail-m_3774089849952339796moz-cite-prefix">On
                            1/5/19 8:19 PM, Ian Dees wrote:<br>
                          </div>
                          <blockquote type="cite">
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>Hi Brad, thanks for proposing this
                                import and posting it here.</div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>I would strongly prefer that we not
                                import boundaries like this into OSM.
                                Boundaries of all sorts are almost
                                impossible to verify with OSM's "on the
                                ground" rule, but BLM boundaries in
                                particular are such an edge case (they
                                have no other analog in the world,
                                really) and almost never have apparent
                                markings on the ground to check. Since
                                these boundaries aren't visible, this
                                data can never be improved by an
                                OpenStreetMap contributor. The
                                boundaries are defined by the
                                government, and any sort of change to
                                them would make them diverge from the
                                official source.</div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>But having said that, I'm curious why
                                you wanted to import this data? Did you
                                want to have it show up on the <a
                                  href="http://osm.org/" target="_blank"
                                  moz-do-not-send="true">osm.org</a>
                                map? Are you trying to build a custom
                                map? Or are you excited to participate
                                and improve OSM? If it's the latter,
                                there's lots of other data that is a
                                better fit to import into OSM: address
                                points and building footprints come to
                                mind, for example.</div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>-Ian</div>
                              <br>
                              <div class="gmail_quote">
                                <div dir="ltr">On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at
                                  9:03 PM brad <<a
                                    href="mailto:bradhaack@fastmail.com"
                                    target="_blank"
                                    moz-do-not-send="true">bradhaack@fastmail.com</a>>
                                  wrote:<br>
                                </div>
                                <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                                  style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                                  0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I'd
                                  like to import BLM (US Bureau of Land
                                  Management) boundaries into <br>
                                  OSM.    This is not an automated
                                  import as you can see from my
                                  workflow.<br>
                                  <br>
                                  Workflow:<br>
                                  Download shape file from PADUS (1
                                  state at a time): <br>
                                  <a
                                    href="https://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/download/"
                                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/download/</a><br>
                                  Load into Qgis and filter for BLM
                                  boundaries<br>
                                  Clean up as necessary (there are some
                                  extraneous ways at state <br>
                                  boundaries & elsewhere)<br>
                                  <br>
                                  Convert to OSM with ogr2osm and the
                                  following tags<br>
                                       tags.update({'type':'boundary'})<br>
                                      
                                  tags.update({'boundary':'protected_area'})<br>
                                       tags.update({'operator':'BLM'})<br>
                                      
                                  tags.update({'ownership':'national'})<br>
                                      
                                  tags.update({'protect_class':'27'})<br>
                                       tags.update({'source':'US BLM'})<br>
                                       use the shapefile attribute
                                  'Unit_Nm' as the name<br>
                                  <br>
                                  Import with JOSM<br>
                                  <br>
                                  The San Luis unit (CO) is here for
                                  your inspection.<br>
                                  <a
                                    href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/qxv5gny2396ewki/sanLuisBLM.osm?dl=0"
                                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.dropbox.com/s/qxv5gny2396ewki/sanLuisBLM.osm?dl=0</a><br>
                                  <br>
                                  Comments?<br>
                                </blockquote>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </blockquote>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        _______________________________________________<br>
                        Talk-us mailing list<br>
                        <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
                        <a
                          href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Talk-us mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br clear="all">
      <br>
      -- <br>
      <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
        <div dir="ltr">Dave Swarthout<br>
          Homer, Alaska<br>
          Chiang Mai, Thailand<br>
          Travel Blog at <a href="http://dswarthout.blogspot.com"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://dswarthout.blogspot.com</a></div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>