<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>20 Dec 2019, 01:25 by baloo@ursamundi.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>So, for example, in the US, instead of motorway, trunk, primary, secondary, tertiary, perhaps something more like freeway, expressway, major/minor_principal (just having this would fix a *lot* of problems with Texas and Missouri and their extensive secondary systems), major/minor_collector...the US just has a way more complex view of how highways work. <br></div><div class=""><div><br></div><div>Or at least some more serious consideration given to the proposal at <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:UltimateRiff/HFCS" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:UltimateRiff/HFCS</a> (but perhaps with "other principal arterials" as primary and a new "highway=quartinary".<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Fitting thing like road classification<br></div><div>into UK system is irritating at times.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But idea of each country with separate tags<br></div><div>for roads is simply a bad idea.<br></div><div><br></div><div>This info is probably worth recording,<br></div><div>but legal status should go into a separate tag.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>