<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 13, 2020, 20:29 by mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On 13/07/2020 14.22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>If you are staying from manually reviewing<br></div><div>and editing based on this new data,<br></div><div>aerials and current data it should be<br></div><div>perfectly fine as long as you actually review<br></div><div>what you add.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>For now, yes. For buildings (later, and I'll probably ping y'all again), I expect that to be more automated, but probably still manually reviewed.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is still required to use a separate account for manually audited changes?<br></div></blockquote><div>Is it going to be "by comparing dataset X and OSM I found places to map roads that I added<br></div><div>using aerial images"? Or more of "manually copied and verified geometries from external dataset"?<br></div><div><br></div><div>I would say that for second case I would create an import page on wiki and so on,<br></div><div>including a separate user while for first just post on relevant mailing lists.<br></div><div><br></div><div>For "more automated" buildings you definitely need separate account, Wiki page documentation<br></div><div>etc.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>