<div dir="ltr">Could we get some examples of what you mean?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:26 PM <<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">That seems sensible. What about the general case (i.e. no continuity<br>
with a county road?) - to add "road" or not?<br>
<br>
On 2020/07/30 7:09, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
> I'd generally include the whole name including "Road" in that case.<br>
> <br>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:03 PM <<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Quick question for clarification.<br>
> <br>
> The US Forest Roads overlay in JOSM shows the name of forest roads<br>
> without "Road"; e.g. "Burton Creek B". Should the suffix "road" be added<br>
> or is it redundant and a waste of bytes? (Sometimes there may be<br>
> continuity from, say, a County Road with e.g. "Burton Creek Road",<br>
> though.)<br>
> <br>
> Mark.<br>
> <br>
> On 2020/07/30 2:55, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
> > Alright, I think we have a consensus forming. Someone want to update<br>
> > the wiki?<br>
> ><br>
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:30 PM Evin Fairchild<br>
> <<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > I'm also in favor of this change. It's a route number, so it only<br>
> > should be in the ref tag. This will make Forest service roads more<br>
> > consistent with other numbered routes. Even though most, if<br>
> not all,<br>
> > Forest service roads don't have a name but just a number, I<br>
> still am<br>
> > in favor of this. I was a bit surprised that the wiki was<br>
> saying to<br>
> > keep the road number in the name.<br>
> ><br>
> > In fact, the names that most of these forest service roads have<br>
> > don't even match common parlance. Most people refer to them as<br>
> > "Forest Service Road XX" whereas the TIGER import called them<br>
> > "National Forest Development Road XX," which might be the official<br>
> > name, but not the most common name.<br>
> ><br>
> > -Evin<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 6:47 AM Mike Thompson<br>
> <<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:33 PM Paul Johnson<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Could we get the US Road Tagging page updated to reflect<br>
> > common name practice instead of encouraging the<br>
> duplication<br>
> > of the ref in the name? Or is that going to spark drama?<br>
> ><br>
> > I am in favor of the change. The name tag should be for the<br>
> > name only.<br>
> ><br>
> > Mike<br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Talk-us mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>>><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Talk-us mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> ><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</blockquote></div>