<div dir="ltr">I'd be inclined to include "Road" on that.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 5:06 PM <<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
County Road 14, Boundary County ID. TIGER name is "Camp Nine Road",<br>
joins with a forest road labelled in the US Forest Roads Overlay as just<br>
"Camp Nine".<br>
<br>
Around 48.7993305N 116.2837172W<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
<br>
On 2020/07/30 8:12, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
> Could we get some examples of what you mean?<br>
> <br>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:26 PM <<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> That seems sensible. What about the general case (i.e. no continuity<br>
> with a county road?) - to add "road" or not?<br>
> <br>
> On 2020/07/30 7:09, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
> > I'd generally include the whole name including "Road" in that case.<br>
> ><br>
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:03 PM <<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net" target="_blank">tj-osmwiki@lowsnr.net</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Quick question for clarification.<br>
> ><br>
> > The US Forest Roads overlay in JOSM shows the name of forest roads<br>
> > without "Road"; e.g. "Burton Creek B". Should the suffix<br>
> "road" be added<br>
> > or is it redundant and a waste of bytes? (Sometimes there may be<br>
> > continuity from, say, a County Road with e.g. "Burton Creek Road",<br>
> > though.)<br>
> ><br>
> > Mark.<br>
> ><br>
> > On 2020/07/30 2:55, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
> > > Alright, I think we have a consensus forming. Someone want<br>
> to update<br>
> > > the wiki?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:30 PM Evin Fairchild<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a>>><br>
> > > <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank">evindfair@gmail.com</a>>>>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I'm also in favor of this change. It's a route number,<br>
> so it only<br>
> > > should be in the ref tag. This will make Forest service<br>
> roads more<br>
> > > consistent with other numbered routes. Even though most, if<br>
> > not all,<br>
> > > Forest service roads don't have a name but just a number, I<br>
> > still am<br>
> > > in favor of this. I was a bit surprised that the wiki was<br>
> > saying to<br>
> > > keep the road number in the name.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > In fact, the names that most of these forest service<br>
> roads have<br>
> > > don't even match common parlance. Most people refer to<br>
> them as<br>
> > > "Forest Service Road XX" whereas the TIGER import called<br>
> them<br>
> > > "National Forest Development Road XX," which might be<br>
> the official<br>
> > > name, but not the most common name.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > -Evin<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 6:47 AM Mike Thompson<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a>>><br>
> > > <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:miketho16@gmail.com" target="_blank">miketho16@gmail.com</a>>>>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:33 PM Paul Johnson<br>
> > > <<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>>>>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > Could we get the US Road Tagging page updated to<br>
> reflect<br>
> > > common name practice instead of encouraging the<br>
> > duplication<br>
> > > of the ref in the name? Or is that going to<br>
> spark drama?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I am in favor of the change. The name tag should be<br>
> for the<br>
> > > name only.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Mike<br>
> > ><br>
> > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > Talk-us mailing list<br>
> > > <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>>>><br>
> > > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > Talk-us mailing list<br>
> > > <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>>><br>
> > > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Talk-us mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>>><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Talk-us mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> ><br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-us mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
> <br>
<br>
-- <br>
Mark Brown<br>
8-3-17-803 Shimorenjaku, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0013<br>
Tel/fax: 0422 42 3151<br>
Mobile: 090 8774 7483 (Japan)<br>
+44 843 849 0359 (UK, VoIP)<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
</blockquote></div>