<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 30, 2020, 20:01 by frederik@remote.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div>While it is undeniably a de-facto tourist attraction, and undeniably<br></div><div>offers great views, I think it should probably be changed to<br></div><div>historic=ruins, access=no, and the tracks leading up to it should also<br></div><div>be changed to access=no.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Opinions?<br></div></blockquote><div>It seems quite clear that tracks should have correct legal status set.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Though I wonder what should be done with viewpoint itself.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is actually viewpoint, it is clearly an attractiom so should<br></div><div>we delete tourism=viewpoint? Probably no.<br></div><div><br></div><div>tourism=viewpoint + access=no (that will be ignored by<br></div><div>all/nearly all data consumers)?<br></div> </body>
</html>