<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:22 PM Andy Townsend <<a href="mailto:ajt1047@gmail.com">ajt1047@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 24/09/2020 00:00, Paul Johnson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 5:56
PM Andy Townsend <<a href="mailto:ajt1047@gmail.com" target="_blank">ajt1047@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>On 23/09/2020 23:01, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 23,
2020 at 4:37 PM stevea <<a href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com" target="_blank">steveaOSM@softworkers.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Paul Johnson
<<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>>
wrote: <br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> > 2.
Tagging route information on ways. It's about a
decade too long at this point for ref=* on a way
to be completely disconnected from the entity the
tag applies to: That's why route relations
exist. Biggest problem child on this at the
moment: OSM's own tilesets. Let's drop rendering
for ref=* on ways and just render the route
relations already, this and multipolygons are why
relations came to exist in the first place.<br>
<br>
Yes, 100% agreement. I think this is simply pure
inertia (the kind that says "broken process") on
the part of renderers.<br>
<br>
Can anybody (renderer authors included, maybe even
especially) are welcome to offer reasons why "the
old machinery" remains in place? Are there legacy
use cases that remain unclear to the wider
community? Please tell us here, if so.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>The US is unusual in that it doesn't have a single ref
per section of road. Most places in OSM map what they
see on the ground, and the current OSM Carto rendering
works just fine for them</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Right up until there's more than one kind of route on the
way. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>No-one's disputing that this is a major problem for mappers in
the US - I'm just saying that it's really not a major problem in
most other places. That doesn't make it any less of a problem in
the US but does help to explain why people elsewhere seem not to
see it as a problem.<br></p></div></blockquote><div>I don't mean just route=road, literally any other route. </div></div></div>