<div dir="auto">I totally support reverting Floridaeditor's changes in order to restore all these divided highways to trunk status. I believe that floridaeditor has been given the opportunity to participate in this discussion, right?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 28, 2020, 3:54 PM Jack Burke <<a href="mailto:burkejf3@gmail.com">burkejf3@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:15 PM Evin Fairchild <<a href="mailto:evindfair@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">evindfair@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> We've always tagged non interstate freeways as motorways. They are often designed to interstate standards and there is literally no distinction between them and interstate freeways except that there's no interstate shield.<br>
><br>
> As for Floridaeditor's edits, I noticed him doing this awhile ago, but didn't really feel like doing anything. Glad someone is sending him and trying to get this resolved. Many of his downgrading from Trump to primary were completely unjustified.<br>
<br>
<br>
Throughout this entire discussion, it sounds like there's pretty good<br>
agreement that trunk is perfectly acceptable to use as a road<br>
classification in OSM for the eastern US, and at least some general<br>
agreement that the examples I cited are reasonable examples of trunk<br>
roads? Am I mis-interpreting anyone?<br>
<br>
And also, that I'm not the only one who's very much disturbed by<br>
floridaeditor's changes?<br>
<br>
Does anyone have a strong problem if I continue going through Georgia<br>
and reversing most of his trunk-to-primary changes?<br>
<br>
--jack<br>
</blockquote></div>