<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:16 PM Martijn van Exel <<a href="mailto:m@rtijn.org">m@rtijn.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Here in Utah, names like "100 South" are common and should not
get a suffix. TIGER may have something like "100 South Street",
but the street is not signed that way, and nobody uses a suffix
locally. <br>
</p>
<p>So, please inquire with locals before cleaning up. Thank you!</p></div></blockquote><div>To that end, the Noble County situation is a little more cut clean, though Exxxx and Nxxxx Road names can be moved to ref=CR Nxxxx or CR Exxxx where a simpler 3 digit, unprefixed CR ref isn't applicable. As for the suffix on named roads, what TIGER has is as good a bet as any, the signage isn't <i>super</i> consistent (or sometimes extant, which given the lack of landmarks can feel a bit like "you are at a crossroads. There are four perfectly straight roads leading from here, all alike" if you don't know where you are in the grid.<br></div></div></div>