<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>May 6, 2021, 21:53 by baloo@ursamundi.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 2:37 PM Minh Nguyen <minh@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div><br></div><div>Vào lúc 21:41 2021-05-05, Adam Franco đã viết:<br></div><div>> At this point I'm thinking of the<br></div><div>> highway=trunk,primary,secondary,tertiary,unclassified,residential values<br></div><div>> as simply funny labels for descending numerical values of<br></div><div>> connectivity-importance. I'm now on board with the position that only<br></div><div>> motorway implies any physical characteristics.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Whoever came up with the original admin_level=* framework was brilliant:<br></div><div>by starting out using only even numeric values, it became possible for<br></div><div>some regions to slot in odd values, ensuring a rough consistency across<br></div><div>regions while accommodating important distinctions peculiar to a<br></div><div>particular region. If the admin_level=7 slot weren't waiting to be used,<br></div><div>I don't know what Ohio and Indiana would've done about townships.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, I'd honestly be OK with dropping highway=* values other than<br></div><div>bridleway, path, footway, cycleway and road entirely and moving the<br></div><div>hierarchical view to highway_level analogous to the admin-level.<br></div></blockquote><div>What would be a difference? highway=* effectively is that,<br></div><div>with sole difference that it is using text names rather than numbers.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>