<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Zeke,<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/14/21 8:57 AM, Zeke Farwell wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAH-nfWNV5iZGxyfQTN_gvPJok1VFgp4YTV+5pijyMmfE8AZVew@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 7:52 PM Eric Patrick <<a
href="mailto:txemt1@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">txemt1@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80)"></span> Functional
classification isn't going for looks, though, it's going
for function. The states have spent a lot of time and
effort since FC was first introduced about a decade ago. </div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Functional classification isn't going for looks, but the
OSM highway=* classification is. [..]<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>In my mind the opposite is true, so this made me curious. In
display maps that render based on functional road classes, you
will find a consistent and complete network visualization across
map zooms, whereas OSM will display a road network with
disconnected segments. Example [1]. Or am I missing your point?<br>
</p>
<p>Martijn<br>
</p>
<p>[1]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#7/36.2888/-96.2326&num=2&mt0=mapnik&mt1=here-map">https://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#7/36.2888/-96.2326&num=2&mt0=mapnik&mt1=here-map</a>
disclaimer -- I work for HERE but discussing on this list as a
private OSM citizen.<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>