[OSM-talk] Cycle route planning using OSM
80n80n at gmail.com
Fri Apr 27 15:05:39 BST 2007
I made a start on the stylesheets for the tiles at home layer but then realised
that the stylesheets main layer still needed some cleaning up and it was
better to do that first.
I've done the cleaning up (including z17!) except for bridges, which I
managed to break. Once I've fixed them I'll update svn and move my
attention to cycle at home.
On 4/27/07, Dirk-Lüder Kreie <osm-list at deelkar.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> David Stevenson schrieb:
> >>> highway=cycleway
> >>> cycleway=opposite_lane
> >> Is an additional way the best option here? To capture both contra-flow
> lanes and lanes on only one side we could use:
> >> cycleway=lane / opposite_lane / lane_left / lane_right /
> opposite_lane_left / opposite_lane/right
> >> Where left and right are relative to the direction of the way. The tag
> would be in addition to the main highway type. Separate ways would seem to
> be more appropriate for paths that are set away from the road.
> > How do we want this rendered?
> > Would it look better to have a cycleway rendered as a separate way along
> > side the highway?
> I just want to add that there is a cycle at home layer planned for
> tiles at home. It's pretty much ready infrastructure-wise, but lacks good
> osmarender stylesheets that highlight cycle/footways and features
> relating to them.
> - --
> Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
> Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk