[OSM-talk] raw GPS points: editable?
luca.dionisi at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 09:44:18 BST 2007
On 8/29/07, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> Mark Williams wrote:
> > I think the old tracks should stay, if only to maintain the audit trail
> > for legal purposes. You could perhaps mark a file as 'deprecated' &
> > exclude it from downloads - 'private' does this now
> Planned feature for Potlatch no. 89423 is colouring GPS traces based
> on the tags.
> So a track tagged 'ncn' or 'cycle', for example, would appear in a
> different colour from one tagged 'canal' or 'waterway'.
> A couple of people have already expressed interest in exposing
> Potlatch's (timestamp-based) tracklog handling through the main API so
> this might also be relevant to other editors.
It seems to me like a good news for what I'm looking for.
Are these tags appliable to single GPS points? Consider
a tag for deprecation of a point.
Keep up with the good work!
More information about the talk