[OSM-talk] Rejected: Landuse=green_space
Alex L. Mauer
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Mon Jun 11 15:28:06 BST 2007
David Earl wrote:
> I think this is a shame. Again, 3 votes is pathetic and neither opposed the
> principle, just the name of the tag!
What is a good number, if 3 votes is pathetic?
> This means some of us will continue to mark the island in the middle of a
> group of houses inappropriately as a park. I have many dozens of such areas
> in and around Cambridge, and the number is growing to an extent that it will
> be hard to change manually before long.
> I will reintroduce this proposal as 'landuse=grass' as that's what the
> voters against wanted, even though it doesn't really describe the concept
> properly: many such islands, corners, breathing spaces have trees and
> shrubbery. If I'd noticed at the time I would have made that comments. But
> the exact tag name really doesn't matter, it's just a word; people do get so
> exercised by what the exact name of tags should be.
Thank you for the comments David. I read the comments on the proposal
and assumed that there already was a landuse=grass tag, and that the
opposition was asking "why?; this is redundant." Thank you for
proposing that as a new value.
Bad - You get pulled over for doing 90 in a school zone and you're drunk
off your ass again at three in the afternoon.
Worse - The cop is drunk too, and he's a mean drunk.
FUCK! - A mean drunk that's actually a swarm of semi-sentient
OpenPGP key id: 51192FF2 @ subkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the talk